- June 4, 2022 at 11:56 am #3737adminKeymaster
Global Supply Chain Management- University of Salford Manchester UK
Assessment Information/Brief 2021/22
To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module.
Information provided should be compatible with the detail contained in the approved module specification although may contain more information for clarity.
Global Supply Chain Management
53095 / 53097
Weighting within module
This assessment is worth 100% of the overall module mark.
Submission deadline date and time
11 March 2022, 4pm
Module Leader/Assessment set by
How to submit
You should submit your assessment via Turnitin.
Assessment task details and instructions
“Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought to light the fact that supply chains function as the veins of our economy and society. Societies and businesses across the world have faced unprecedented challenges due to the disruptions that the coronavirus outbreak, and the consequent great lockdown, have caused. Individuals, for instance, have dealt with a range of changes in their lives, from self-isolation to difficulties stocking up on essentials.,” https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MSCRA-05-2020-0011/full/html
Based on the above statement, you are asked to choose a sector/industry (e.g., food, steel, healthcare, retail, services, automotive), and critically:
i. Appraise how the supply chain structure has been changed because of the COVID-19 pandemic situation.
ii. Evaluate how the industry/sector has managed (or still manages) to tackle inventory management related issues that arose after the COVID-19 breakout.
iii. Discuss how advanced technologies (e.g., Big Data analytics, Internet of Things, Omnichannel) may help the industry/sector to recover and improve its overall supply chain performance.
For each question above, you should support your arguments by bringing into the discussion 1-2 examples of companies that belong to the selected sector/industry. You will also need to consider the following when completing your assignment:
• Quality of executive summary (does it give a brief complete summary of your paper for an executive to read?)
• Establishment of supply chain theory (e.g. how supply chain environments are differentiated from region to region?)
• Allocation of credit and sources used (have I included references and citations to the material I have used?)
• Clarity of argument
• Overall report presentation including spelling and grammar
• Adherence to nominated word limit (+/- 10%)
• Word processed (letter size 12, times new roman, 1.5 space)
• Fully referenced (Harvard Referencing System). Please refer to the reading list and academic sources issued in Blackboard
Global Supply Chain Management writing help- University of Salford Manchester
Use of theory/reference to course ideas
Examples (Companies trading in the sector)
Understanding of the matter
Quality of argument
Citation and References
Please remember that marks for the assignment will also be awarded in relation to presentation and structure, and aspects such as the use of examples, figures, tables, illustrations and statistics that indicate wider/independent reading.
Explicit marking criteria and mark ranges can be found below.
Assessed intended learning outcomes
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding
1. Critically analyse the theory, concepts and models of global supply chain management to interpret and understand complex and ambiguous risks in global logistics and supply chain environments.
2. Synthesise facts and ideas in support of an argument when evolving alternative solutions and concepts such as lean and agile supply
3. Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of global lead-time management and time-compression.
4. Critically evaluate the role of national and regional distribution centres (NDC/RDC) and warehouse management systems (WMS)in the strategic development of international supply chains
5. Demonstrate a sound understanding of the role and importance of an integrated and responsible approach in shaping managerial attitudes and actions, and in the establishment and maintenance of cross-functional teams and longer-term stakeholder relationships
Practical, Professional or Subject Specific Skills
1. Leads by example – as high levels of self-awareness, emotional and social intelligence, empathy and compassion, and able to identify mental well-being in others. Work collaboratively enabling empowerment and delegation – acts with humility and authenticity, is credible, confident and resilient.
2. Judgement and Challenge – Takes personal accountability aligned to clear values. Demonstrates flexibility and willingness to challenge when making decisions and solving problems – instils confidence demonstrating honesty, integrity, openness, and trust.
3. Courage & Curiosity – is confident and brave, willing to innovate, seeks new ideas and looks for contingencies. Manages complexity and ambiguity, comfortable in uncertainty, and is pragmatic.
4. Valuing Difference – engaging with all, is ethical and demonstrates inclusivity, recognising diversity, championing, and enabling cultural inclusion. Empowers and motivates to inspire and support others.
5. Professional Reflects on own performance, demonstrates professional standards in relation behaviour and ongoing development. Advocates the use of good practice within and outside the organisation.
Transferable Skills and other Attributes
1. Identify and utilise appropriate methods for collecting and analysing data related to global supply chain management issues.
2. Locate, summarise and synthesise a range of information from published literature and electronic sources on global supply chain management.
3. Work on their own and with others in analysing and presenting solutions to complex supply chain issues in a range of diverse environments.
4. Manage their time to meet deadlines in both group discussions and in preparation of in-class activities
MBA Global Supply Chain Management writing help- University of Salford Manchester UK
1. To enable students to develop an in-depth understanding of the critical nature and meaning of global supply chain management and its application across a range of organisations and sectors internationally.
2. To provide students with an analytical framework for global procurement, logistics and supply chain systems, their design, monitoring and control
3. To facilitate a critical evaluation of the contribution of global logistics and supply chain to an organisation’s competitive advantage
4. To enable students to recognise and implement responsible and sustainable approaches to supply chain management.
Word count/ duration (if applicable) Global Supply Chain Management writing help- University of Salford Manchester
The maximum word count is 3000 words (+/- 10%), excluding References. Words over the word limit may not be considered and not marked.
You can expect to receive feedback for your assignment in Turnitin. Summative feedback will be provided within two weeks from the date of your assignment submission. Formative assessments with feedback will be provided during after the first day of delivery.
You can obtain support for this assessment by sources, which can be found in Blackboard. For further support please send an email to Dr Christos Papanagnou or visit his room during his office hours.
The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS.
Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct
Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.
Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously. You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.
If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.
Personal Mitigating Circumstances
If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.
Personal Tutor/Student Progression Administrator
If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Personal Tutor or your Student Progression Administrator.
You should look at the assessment criteria to find out what we are specifically looking at during the assessment.
In Year Retrieval Scheme
Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval. If you are eligible for this scheme, you will be contacted shortly after the feedback deadline.
If you fail your assessment and are eligible for reassessment, you will need to resubmit in a date that will be notified to you. For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt. Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes those students who have an accepted PMC request from a previous attempt).
If a student needs to be reassessed, s/he will be given a new assignment brief with a deadline, which will be provided by the School.
Below are the Level 7 undergraduate Generic Grade Descriptors for ‘Knowledge’ Global Supply Chain Management- University of Salford Manchester UK
Outstanding – 100-90
o Outstanding knowledge. Theory is linked to practice to an exceptional level and may be used to formulate new questions, ideas, or challenges.
Excellent – 80-89
o Integrates the complexity of a range of knowledge and excellent understanding of its relevance
o Excellent depth of knowledge in a variety of contexts. Coherent application of theory to practice
Very Good – 70-79
o Comprehensive knowledge showing very good depth and breadth. Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately. Consistently accurate level of knowledge in depth and breadth.
Good – 60-69
o Consistently relevant, accurate knowledge with good depth and breadth. Clear and relevant application of theory to practice. Good identification of key themes. A good demonstration of depth and breadth of knowledge.
Fair – 50-59
o Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth of knowledge. Sound integration of theory and practice with satisfactory identification of key themes. Fair demonstration of depth and breadth of knowledge.
Adequate – 40-49
o Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies appropriates yet basic integration of theory and practice. Superficial depth or limited breadth with unsatisfactory identification of key themes. Basic knowledge demonstrated with some inaccuracies.
Unsatisfactory – 30-39
o Limited evidence of knowledge. Inappropriate links between theory and practice.
o Inadequate identification of key themes.
Poor – 20-29
o Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge. Limited and inappropriate or inaccurate links between theory and practice. Poor identification of key themes.
Very Poor – 10-19
o Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated. Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice. Very poor identification of key themes.
Extremely Poor – 1-9
o Totally inadequate demonstration of required knowledge. Not able to link theory to practice. No appropriate themes were identified.
Criterion / Mark range
(indicative – not for grading)
Standard comparable to a journal publication
Standard comparable to conference paper publication
Distinctive work for Masters level
Merit work for Masters level
Acceptable for Masters
Below Masters pass standard
Significantly below Masters pass standard
Use of theory
Demonstrates an outstanding knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Insightfully interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates a superior level of originality in conceptual understanding.
Demonstrates an exceptional knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Expertly interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates an excellent level of originality in conceptual understanding.
Demonstrates excellent knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Proficiently interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates a very good level of originality in conceptual understanding.
Demonstrates sound knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Comprehensively interprets appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates a good level of originality in conceptual understanding
Demonstrates an adequate knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Some minor omissions. Satisfactorily interprets some appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates a fair level of originality in conceptual understanding.
Some omissions are evident in the knowledge of theory and practice at this level. Insufficient understanding of appropriate concepts and theoretical models. Demonstrates some conceptual understanding of places.
Demonstrates weaknesses in the knowledge of theory and practice for this level. Limited understanding and application of concepts.
Outstanding use of examples includes what is important, and excludes irrelevant issues. Comprehensive literature review. Evaluation and synthesis of source material to produce an outstanding contribution.
Exceptional use of examples, boundaries set with no significant omissions or unnecessary issues. Excellent independent secondary research. Sources are evaluated and synthesized to produce an excellent contribution.
Excellent use of examples Very good setting of boundaries includes most of what is relevant. Very good independent secondary research. Sources are evaluated and synthesized to produce a very good contribution.
Good use of examples, with some omissions or unnecessary issues. Good secondary research to extend taught materials. Evidence of evaluation of sources, with some deficiencies in choice and synthesis.
Fair use of examples but with some omissions and unnecessary issues. Limited secondary research to extend taught materials. Limited evaluation of sources, deficiencies in choice and synthesis.
Poorly use of examples, with significant omissions and unnecessary issues. Little or no extension of taught materials. Poor choice and synthesis of materials.
Little or no examples provided or focus evident. Poor use of taught materials. No synthesis.
Understanding of subject matter
Outstanding with critical awareness of the relevance of issues. Directly relevant to title/brief. Expertly addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.
Excellent with critical awareness of relevance of issues. Directly relevant to title/brief. Skillfully addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief.
Very good with critical awareness of relevance of issues. Directly relevant to title/brief. Addresses well the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief well.
Good with some awareness of relevance of issues. Generally addresses the assumptions of the title and/or the requirements of the brief. Minor irrelevance in places.
Basic with limited awareness of relevance of issues. Some implications of issues explored.
Poor with little awareness of relevance of issues. A significant degree of irrelevance to the title and/or brief. Issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms.
Little or no understanding of the subject matter is demonstrated. Relevance to the title and/or brief is missing.
Assessment Information-Academic writing help for Global Supply Chain Management writing help- University of Salford Manchester
Quality of argument
Well structured, compelling and persuasive argument that leads to a valuable contribution to the field of study, paving the way for future work. Outstanding expression of ideas.
Argument has excellent structure and persuasiveness, leading to very significant insights and relevant future work. Excellent expression of ideas.
Well-structured and persuasive argument Insightful conclusion draws together key issues and possible future work. Outstanding expression of ideas.
Structured and fairly convincing argument leads to conclusion that summarises key issues. Ideas are expressed, with some limitation.
Argument has some structure and development towards conclusion with limitations in summary of issues. Some irrelevant and/or superficial arguments. Limited expression of ideas.
Argument is unstructured, no recognizable conclusion.
No evidence of argument or conclusion.
Executive summary and conclusions
Critical analysis of findings. Coherently articulated and logically structured including reccomendations. An appropriate format is used.
Excellent analysis of findings. Clearly articulated and logically structured including reccomendations. An appropriate format is used.
Very good analysis of findings. For the most part coherently articulated and logically constructed. An appropriate format is used.
Good analysis of findings. For the most part coherently articulated and logically constructed. An appropriate format is used.
Fair analysis of findings. Adequate attempt at articulation and logical structure. An acceptable format is used.
Little or no analysis of findings. Limited attempt at articulation and problems with structure. Some formatting errors.
No valid analysis of findings. Lack of articulation and format is deficient.
URGENT ORDERS – email@example.com
Website – http://www.assignmentshelp4u.com
#UK #University #Manchester #assignment #assignmenthelp #assignmentwritinghelp #solvedassignment #supplychain #SCM #MBAwriting #supplychainthesis #supplychainproposal #thesis #SCMthesis Global Supply Chain Management writing help- University of Salford Manchester MBA,
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.